We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 09 October 09
INDIKA IN TALKS TO SELL 4M TONS OF COAL, EYEING BP ASSETS
The Jakarta Post reported that, Energy company PT Indika Energy is in talks with Indian buyers to sell 4 million tons of coal next year, one of its ...
Friday, 09 October 09
BULK-SHIPPING LINES MUST CANCEL 50% OF NEW ORDERS, PLATOU SAYS
Bloomberg reported that, Bulk-shipping lines need to cancel half of the new vessels they have on order to ease a capacity glut and revive freight ra ...
Friday, 09 October 09
THE BALTIC DRY INDEX WOKE UP: DRY BULK MARKET ON THE RISE
Hellenic Shipping News reported that, In what could prove the beginning of a new and sustainable rally for the dry bulk market, the BDI (Baltic Dry ...
Friday, 09 October 09
STRAITS ASIA INDONESIAN MINE COAL LOADER COLLAPSES
* New coal loading facility collapsed due to heavy rain
* Older coal loading facility seem unaffected so far
* UBS may cut valuation if disruption ...
Thursday, 08 October 09
COAL INDIA SAYS IMPORTS COULD JUMP 10 TIMES IN 3 YRS
Reuters reported that, Coal imports by state explorer Coal India Ltd could jump 10 times to 40-45 million tonnes in three years to meet a sharp rise ...
|
|
|
Showing 6356 to 6360 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
