We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 08 October 09
MINING TO ATTRACT $6B: BKPM
The Jakarta Post reported that, Indonesia’s mining sector could expect investment of up to US$6 billion in the 2010-2012 period, in part becau ...
Thursday, 08 October 09
INDIA DEMAND TO HELP DIRE COAL OUTLOOK - MACQUARIE
Reuters reported that, Macquarie Securities said on Wednesday its bearish short-term outlook on thermal coal may begin improving in a year's time o ...
Thursday, 08 October 09
ESSAR UNIT WINS INR 479 CR (US$ 103,272,401) ORISSA PROJECT
The firm will develop and operate the terminal at Paradip port; the contract will stretch up to 30 years
Live Mint reported that, Essar Shipping ...
Wednesday, 07 October 09
ESSAR, JINDAL IN TAKEOVER TUSSLE FOR AUSTRALIAN COAL MINER
Reuters reported that, Privately owned Essar Group has launched a surprise A$144.2 million ($128.1 million) bid for Australian coal minnow Rocklands ...
Wednesday, 07 October 09
ADARO SECURES $500 M LOAN
The Jakarta Post reported that, The country's second largest coal producer, PT Adaro Energy announced on Wednesday that it has secured US$500 milli ...
|
|
|
Showing 6361 to 6365 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
|
| |
| |
|