We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 20 October 09
COAL PRICES TO SURGE IN 2010 DESPITE AMPLE SUPPLY
Commodity Online reported that, Coal prices are indeed destined to go higher as they follow the rise of ‘coal currencies’ such as Austra ...
Tuesday, 20 October 09
INDIA MAY CUT STAKE IN NTPC BY DECEMBER, POWER SECRETARY SAYS
Bloomberg reported that, India’s government may sell a 5 percent stake in NTPC Ltd., the country’s biggest power producer, as early as D ...
Monday, 19 October 09
COAL PRICE UP AGAIN - RICHARDS BAY TERMINAL
Export prices rose 45 cents, or 0.7%, to an average of 64.05 a metric ton in the week ended Oct. 16, according to McCloskey Group.
The week was & ...
Monday, 19 October 09
COAL MINISTRY SEEKS EXPLANATION FROM AP GENCO
The Hindu Business reported that, the Coal Ministry has asked the Power Generation Corporation of Andhra Pradesh (AP Genco) to explain why there was ...
Monday, 19 October 09
CEMENT UNLIKELY TO COST MORE DESPITE COAL PRICE HIKE
Business-Standard reported that, Cement manufacturers will not immediately hike prices of the construction material, despite a surge in their input ...
|
|
|
Showing 6326 to 6330 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- White Energy Company Limited
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Planning Commission, India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
|
| |
| |
|
