We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 15 October 09
GOVT TO CAP COAL EXPORTS AT 150 MILLION TONS A YEAR
The Jakarta Post reported that, The government plans to cap coal exports at around 150 million tons a year in a bid to guarantee supply for domestic ...
Thursday, 15 October 09
AUSTRALIAN MINING COMPANIES REPORTED FINDING 1.5 BILLION COAL MINE DEPOSIT IN MOZAMBIQUE
Paguntaka reported that, Mozambique is a country that has the potential mining areas are very rich. Many mining companies who want to invest in the ...
Wednesday, 14 October 09
INDONESIA POWER FIRM SIGNS LOAN AGREEMENTS FOR OVER $1 BLN
Reuters reported that, Indonesia's state electricity firm PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN) has raised more than $1 billion from a group of banks ...
Wednesday, 14 October 09
LARSEN & TOUBRO MAY ENTER POWER GENERATION BUSINESS IN INDIA
Bloomberg reported that, Larsen & Toubro Ltd., India’s biggest engineering company, said it is considering entering the power generation b ...
Wednesday, 14 October 09
INDONESIA MULLS TO LIMIT COAL EXPORT
China View reported that, The Indonesian government planned to limit coal export of up to 150 million tons per year due to the growing coal demand i ...
|
|
|
Showing 6336 to 6340 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Australian Coal Association
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
