We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 22 October 09
2ND UNITED INDONESIA CABINET UNVEILED
The Jakarta Post reported that, President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono announced his second United Indonesia Cabinet on Wednesday night, comprising 34 m ...
Thursday, 22 October 09
PEABODY SET TO TAP ASIAN DEMAND FOR COAL
The Australian reported that, US coal giant Peabody Energy plans to double its Queensland and NSW coal exports in the next five years, as it looks t ...
Wednesday, 21 October 09
INDONESIA POWER FIRM SEEKS TO DEFER COAL SUPPLIES
Reuters reported that, Indonesia's state power firm is negotiating with two coal producers, including a unit of PT Bumi Resources Tbk, to defer a c ...
Wednesday, 21 October 09
MINING REGULATION GENERATES CONFUSION IN INDONESIA
The Jakarta Globe reported that, Mining industry representatives said on Friday they were confused by a recently issued regulation restricting the w ...
Wednesday, 21 October 09
LAW ACCOMMODATES NATIONAL AND INVESTOR INTERESTS
COALspot.com (Indonesia): According to ESDM, the government has issued five Lawson the energy and mineral resources sector. These laws will prioriti ...
|
|
|
Showing 6316 to 6320 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Planning Commission, India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Economic Council, Georgia
|
| |
| |
|