We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 24 October 09
ADANI, MMTC IN RACE TO SUPPLY COAL TO GSECL
Business-Standard reported that, as many as five companies are in fray to supply 15 lakh (1.5 million) metric tonnes of non-coking steam (ther ...
Saturday, 24 October 09
INDONESIA STATE POWER FIRM PLANS TO DELAY COAL SUPPLIES
Indonesia's state-controlled electricity company is negotiating with two coal producing firms to delay plans to supply coal to a power plant in Wes ...
Friday, 23 October 09
MONGOLIA LISTS 8 POTENTIAL BIDDERS FOR COAL PROJECT
Reuters reported that, Mongolia has shortlisted eight potential partners for its huge Tavan Tolgoi coking coal project, according to Temuulen Ganzor ...
Friday, 23 October 09
2010 WILL BE 'BRIDGE YEAR' FOR COAL - CONSOL CHIEF
Mining Weekly reported that, After a difficult 2009, 2010 will likely be a “bridge” year for the US coal industry, followed by improved ...
Friday, 23 October 09
INDIAN GROUP INTERESTED IN MOZAMBICAN COAL
Mining Weekly reported that, India’s leading steelmaker, the Steel Authority of India Limited (Sail), has confirmed that it is seeking to acqu ...
|
|
|
Showing 6306 to 6310 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PTC India Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Minerals Council of Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Planning Commission, India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
|
| |
| |
|
