We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 28 October 09
INVESTMENT IN MINING SECTOR HAMPERED BY LATE REGULATIONS
The Jakarta Post reported that, Indonesia may have to wait for a potential massive inflow of new investment into the mining sector due to delays in ...
Tuesday, 27 October 09
CHINA'S SEPT. COAL IMPORTS RISE AS ECONOMY RECOVERS
Bloomberg reported that, China, the world’s largest coal user and producer, increased imports of the fuel in September to meet rising domest ...
Monday, 26 October 09
DARWIN EYES PRIVATE INVESTMENT
The Jakarta Post reported that, the new energy and ministerial resources minister, Darwin Zahedy Saleh, has set his sights on accelerating the reali ...
Sunday, 25 October 09
THE FUTURE FREIGHT MARKET IS EXPECTED TO HAVE POSITIVE DIRECTION - VISTAAR
COALspot.com (Singapore): According to Vistaar Shipping an experienced ship operator in Singapore, the BDI shot up this week (19-24 October) by abou ...
Saturday, 24 October 09
NTPC SEEKS ALTERNATE COAL SUPPLY FOR KAHALGAON
State-run NTPC is looking at alternate sources of coal to fire its Kahalgaon (Bihar) and Farakka (West Bengal) and power stations, which are facing ...
|
|
|
Showing 6301 to 6305 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Planning Commission, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
