We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 11 November 09
INDONESIA ASKS DOMESTIC COAL FIRMS TO SET ASIDE 30PCT OF OUTPUT
Indonesian government said that it had asked domestic coal producers to set aside 30% of their output next year to meet demand from new coal fired p ...
Wednesday, 11 November 09
MINING ACQUISITIONS BECOMING MORE STRATEGIC - E&Y
Mining Weekly reported that, Although miners around the world are looking to position themselves for growth, companies are being more selective when ...
Tuesday, 10 November 09
THAI COAL MINER BANPU Q3 NET UP, BEATS FORECAST
Reuters reported that, Thailand's top coal miner, Banpu, said on Tuesday its third-quarter net earnings rose a higher-than-expected 22 percent, hel ...
Monday, 09 November 09
NAPOCOR DEFERS 50,000 T COAL TENDER
Top Philippine electricity producer National Power Corp. (Napocor) has indefinitely postponed a tender for supply of 50,000 tons of steam coal sched ...
Monday, 09 November 09
SAM'S SEAFOOD HOLDINGS SET TO COMMENCE DRILLING AT INDONESIAN COAL PROJECT
Proactive Investors reported that, Sam's Seafood Holdings is preparing to kick off diamond drilling at the company's Indonesian coal project after ...
|
|
|
Showing 6261 to 6265 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Planning Commission, India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- White Energy Company Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- The University of Queensland
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|