We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 24 March 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Since the start of the pandemic, the shipping industry has efficiently responded to ensure the continuity of operations and hence the security of s ...
Tuesday, 23 March 21
LOWER WHOLESALE PRICES PUT PRESSURE ON AUSTRALIAN ENERGY RETAILERS - FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Ratings expects the low wholesale energy prices in the Australian National Energy Market to persist through to 2022, which will affect electr ...
Tuesday, 23 March 21
SCRUBBER-FITTED SHIPS NEARLY DOUBLE AS FUEL SPREAD SETTLES AT $118 PER MT - PETER SAND
As the lion’s share of the world fleet replaced high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) with low-sulphur fuel oil (LFSO) as a mean of propulsion to be c ...
Tuesday, 23 March 21
CHINA'S COAL OUTPUT EDGES UP IN FIRST TWO MONTHS - XINHUA
China’s raw coal output rose 25 percent year on year to 620 million tonnes in the first two months of 2021, official data showed.
...
Wednesday, 17 March 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Shipping market players are familiar with the inverse correlation between the freight market and demolition activity i.e. when the market picks up ...
|
|
|
Showing 616 to 620 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- VISA Power Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- White Energy Company Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- The University of Queensland
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
|
| |
| |
|
