We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 19 November 09
FAST-TRACK FOCUS ON COAL POWER MAY COST INDONESIA BILLIONS
The Jakartaglobe reported that, As it begins to tap its massive coal reserves to generate cheap electricity, Indonesia may face additional costs of ...
Wednesday, 18 November 09
THAI PTT PLANS COAL MINE INVESTMENT IN INDONESIA
* To conclude Indonesian coal mine buy in 6 months
* Sees coal output jumping to 20 mln tonnes in five years
Reuters reported that, PTT , ...
Wednesday, 18 November 09
ASIA-PACIFIC MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
“Building Asia’s Infrastructure”
COALspot.com (Indonesia) Press Release: Infrastructure Asia 2010 is Asia’s premier infra ...
Wednesday, 18 November 09
AMBUJA COAL TENDER PRICES EQUATE TO $61.50/T FOB
Reuters reported that, coal prices achieved by Indian cement maker Gujarat Ambuja in its early November tender equate to $61.50 a tonne FOB Richards ...
Tuesday, 17 November 09
JSW STEEL MAY SPEND $500 MILLION TO ACQUIRE COAL MINES OVERSEAS
JSW Steel Ltd., India’s third- biggest producer, may spend $500 million buying coal mines overseas, securing supplies for its local expansion. ...
|
|
|
Showing 6241 to 6245 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Planning Commission, India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- MS Steel International - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
