We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 16 November 09
141 VESSELS ARE EXPECTED TO LOAD 8.833 MILLION TONS OF INDONESIAN COAL BEFORE 30 NOVEMBER 2009
COALspot.com (Indonesia): 141 vessels are expected to load or sail with 8.833 million tons of Indonesian coal before 30 November 2009.
A source f ...
Sunday, 15 November 09
NALCO SHELVES SA PROJECT- PUTS IRAN PROJECT ON HOLD
The Economic Times reported that, In a twin decision on its global operations involving about Rs 27,000-crore (US$ 5.847billions) investment, the st ...
Saturday, 14 November 09
SHORT PERIOD RATES FOR SUPRAMAX WAS AT US$ 19,000 / 20,000 PER DAY FOR VESSELS OPENING FAR EAST / SE ASIA - VISTAAR SINGAPORE
COALspot.com (Singaproe): BDI continues to rally crossing the 4,000 mark. The BDI increased this week by 718 points up by 21 pct and closed at 4,111 ...
Saturday, 14 November 09
CHINA HAS BEEN THE LARGEST SINGLE BUYER OF INDONESIAN COAL IN OCTOBER, TAKING 24.37% OF TOTAL EXPORT QUANTITY OF 22.637 MILLION TONS
COALspot.com (Indonesia): China has been the largest single buyer of Indonesian coal in October 2009, taking 24.37% of total export quantity o ...
Saturday, 14 November 09
ASIA'S POWER SECTOR IS INVESTING IN COALMINES TO SECURE SUPPLIES
COALspot.com (Press Release): Asia Coal Power conference in Jakarta pinpoints growing power demand in Asia & Power sector investments in Indones ...
|
|
|
Showing 6246 to 6250 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
|
| |
| |
|