We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 22 November 09
SHORT PERIOD RATES FOR SUPRAMAX WAS AT US$ 25,000/26,000 PER DAY FOR VESSELS OPENING FAR EAST / SE ASIA - VISTAAR ANALYSIS
COALspot.com (Singapore): Analyised by Capt. Radhakrishnan Reddy, Managing Director of Vistaar Shipping Services, Singapore.
BDI hits a new high ...
Friday, 20 November 09
INDONESIA UNITED TRACTORS PLANS $430 MLN CAPEX IN 2010
Reuters reported that, Indonesian heavy equipment distributor and mining contractor PT United Tractors Tbk plans capital expenditure of $430 million ...
Friday, 20 November 09
DRY BULK SHIP OWNERS HOPE RALLY WILL LAST
Boon times are still on the daily agenda of every dry bulk ship owner these days after one of the toughest year in the industry’s century-old ...
Friday, 20 November 09
NTPC LOOKING FOR LONG TERM CONTRACTS FOR COAL IMPORT
Business Standard of India reported that, State run power firm NTPC today said it is looking for long-term supply of coal from overseas market to me ...
Friday, 20 November 09
CHINESE COKING COAL SUPPLY TO BE 'TIGHT' IN 2010, KGI SAYS
Bloomberg Reported that, Stephen Wang, an analyst with KGI Securities in Taipei, comments on the outlook for Chinese steel production and demand for ...
|
|
|
Showing 6231 to 6235 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- The University of Queensland
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Planning Commission, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Australian Coal Association
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
|
| |
| |
|
