We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 25 November 09
NAPOCOR SCRAPS AWARD OF 715,000 TONS COAL
Top Philippine electricity producer National Power Corp. (Napocor) said on Wednesday it had cancelled plans to award 715,000 tons in coal supply con ...
Wednesday, 25 November 09
RISING FREIGHT RATES HIT COAL IMPORTERS
While state-owned NTPC’s 12.5 million tonne coal import order may have been aimed at plugging the shortage of coal at its thermal power plants ...
Wednesday, 25 November 09
CSN TO BUY RIVERSDALE STAKE TO BOOST COAL SUPPLIES
Cia. Siderurgica Nacional SA plans to buy 16.3 percent of Australian coal-exploration company Riversdale Mining Ltd. for about A$190.5 million ($175 ...
Tuesday, 24 November 09
ICRA DOWNGRADES TNPL`S RATING TO LAA
Credit rating agency, ICRA has revised the long term rating for the Rs 11.25 billion long-term fund-based bank facilities and Rs 1.5 billion non-con ...
Monday, 23 November 09
INDONESIA MINING RULE THREATENS INVESTMENT DRIVE
A new Indonesian mining rule, limiting contract work that can be outsourced and favouring local players, is shaping up as a new blow to plans ...
|
|
|
Showing 6226 to 6230 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
