We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 07 April 21
KOMIPO ISSUED A TENDER FOR TOTAL 1,560,000 METRIC TONS OF BITUMINOUS COAL
COALspot.com: South Korea state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued a tender for total 1,560,000 Metric Tons of Bituminous coal for i ...
Wednesday, 07 April 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Following the end of the catholic easter, during which the majority of shipping market participants were on holidays, it is interesting to note a f ...
Wednesday, 07 April 21
COAL USED TO GENERATE ELECTRIC POWER IN U.S. WILL INCREASE BY 13 PERCENT TO 495 MMST IN 2021 - EIA
EIA expects U.S. coal production to total 585 MMst in 2021, 46 MMst (9%) more than in 2020. In 2022, EIA expects coal production to grow by an addi ...
Wednesday, 31 March 21
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX UP 0.12 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 139.03 points Monday, up 0.12 percent week on week.
The index, released by China ...
Wednesday, 31 March 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Over the past week, the biggest story has been the blockage of the Suez Canal, as a result of the grounding of the container ship Ever Given. At th ...
|
|
|
Showing 606 to 610 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
