We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 07 January 10
INDONESIAS COAL OUTPUT MAY RISE TO 309 MILLION TONS IN 2014 - BLOOMBERG
Indonesia’s coal production may rise to 309 million tons by 2014 from an estimated 250 million tons this year, Bambang Setiawan, director-gene ...
Wednesday, 06 January 10
RICHARDS BAY SAYS 46% OF COAL EXPORTS WENT TO EUROPE
Richards Bay Coal Terminal, through which almost all of South Africa’s coal exports are routed, said 46 percent of the coal it exported in 200 ...
Wednesday, 06 January 10
CHINA-AUSTRALIA INVESTMENT TIES SEEN IMPROVING IN 2010
Australia and China showed a united front in a bid to improve investment ties as they signed a $3-billion coal deal on Wednesday, following a rocky ...
Wednesday, 06 January 10
INVESTMENT IN MINING TO TOP $2.5B IN 2010
The government plans to invest US$2.5 billion in the mining sector, an official said Tuesday.
Bambang Setiawan, the director general of mineral r ...
Wednesday, 06 January 10
SAS 2009 COAL EXPORTS THROUGH RBCT FLAT AT 61MT
Exports through South Africa’s Richards Bay Coal Terminal (RBCT) remained flat in 2009, as the terminal faced “critical business challen ...
|
|
|
Showing 6111 to 6115 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Planning Commission, India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
|
| |
| |
|