We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 04 January 10
TOKYO ELECTRIC SEALS XSTRATA COAL DEAL
Tokyo Electric Power Co has agreed to pay about $US85 a tonne for Australian thermal coal in 2010 from miner Xstrata, a source familiar with the pri ...
Monday, 04 January 10
IND-BARATH TO SHIFT PROJECT FROM AP TO TN
Hyderabad-based power producer Ind–Barath is planning to set up a power plant at Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu. The proposed project would attract inv ...
Sunday, 03 January 10
NEWCASTLE THERMAL COAL PRICES FALL IN FIRST DECLINE IN 3 WEEKS
Power-station coal prices at Australia’s Newcastle port, a benchmark for Asia, declined 1.5 percent, falling for the first time in three weeks ...
Sunday, 03 January 10
NTPC SEEKS REPORT ON TRANSPORTING COAL THROUGH WATERWAYS
State-run National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC), the country’s largest power utility, has asked for a “holistic” feasibility r ...
Sunday, 03 January 10
BHP TO STAY IN MARUWAI AND TO KEEP 75 PERCENT OF THE STAKE
Despite recent statements that it would pull out completely from Indonesia, the world's largest mining company BHP Billiton has now admitted that i ...
|
|
|
Showing 6121 to 6125 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Planning Commission, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Australian Coal Association
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- The University of Queensland
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
|
| |
| |
|
