We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 12 January 10
COAL PRICE FORECAST RAISED AT ANZ ON STRONGER CHINESE DEMAND
Power-station coal price forecasts for this year were raised 19 percent by Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. on rising demand from Chin ...
Tuesday, 12 January 10
BUMIS SALE CONTRACT ONLY REACHED 35 PERCENT
PT Bumi Resources has only completed 35 percent if its coal sale contract this year. “More than 65 percent of our sale volume did not have a c ...
Monday, 11 January 10
THE MARKET IS LIKELY TO BE STEADY - VISTAAR SINGAPORE
COALspot.com (Singapore): The freight market for the first week of the year was quite active and the market especially in the Panamax and Supramax s ...
Monday, 11 January 10
CHINAS COAL EXPORT MAY DECLINE 50% IN 2009
Preliminary data released by China's General Administration of Customs (GAC) on Wednesday showed that China's coal export reached 2.05 million ton ...
Saturday, 09 January 10
THE FAR EAST MARKET STARTED TO STABILIZE - FEARNLEYS
Handy
The FEAST market started to stabilize after the quite holidays and we saw growing activity fed by Chinese coal and iron ore imports and Indi ...
|
|
|
Showing 6101 to 6105 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- The University of Queensland
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
|
| |
| |
|
