We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 13 January 10
ADHUNIK GROUP TO BUY 50 PCT IN AUSTRALIA MINE
The Adhunik group of Industries is in talks to acquire 50 percent in an Australian coking coal mine for $100 million, the Economic Times reported on ...
Wednesday, 13 January 10
COAL MARKETS 2010 CONFERENCE - SINGAPORE, 28 - 29 JANUARY 2010
COALspot.com (Press Release): As an established annual event that has been running for more than 7 years now with extensive industry support from ke ...
Wednesday, 13 January 10
IRON ORE PRICE TIPPED TO RISE 40PC, SAYS ANZ
THE price battle in the controversial iron ore negotiations is expected to intensify.
ANZ senior commodities analyst Mark Pervan has increased h ...
Wednesday, 13 January 10
KANGAROO RESOURCES KICKS OFF INDONESIAN COAL PRODUCTION
Coal-focused company Kangaroo Resources has formally joined the ranks of international coal operators after wrapping up the delivery and sale o ...
Wednesday, 13 January 10
CONSOL SELLS FIRST COAL TO CHINA
Coal and natural gas company CONSOL Energy Inc.made its first sale of high-volume coking coal to Asia from its Bailey Mine in Northern Appalachia. T ...
|
|
|
Showing 6096 to 6100 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
