We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 18 April 21
INDONESIA LIKELY TO WITNESS 119 OIL AND GAS PROJECTS STARTS ACROSS VALUE CHAIN BY 2025, SAYS GLOBALDATA
Indonesia is expected to witness 119 oil and gas projects commencing their operations across value chain during 2021-2025, accounting for 6% of the ...
Sunday, 18 April 21
WORLDSTEEL RAISES 2021 STEEL DEMAND GROWTH FORECAST TO 5.8% - WORLDSTEEL
The World Steel Association (worldsteel) today released its Short Range Outlook (SRO) for 2021 and 2022. worldsteel forecasts that steel demand wil ...
Sunday, 18 April 21
CHINA'S Q1 COAL OUTPUT RISES 16% ON STRONG DEMAND FOR WINTER HEATING - REUTERS
China’s coal output rose 16% in the first quarter from the same period last year, bolstered by strong demand for winter heating and robust in ...
Wednesday, 14 April 21
INDIA HAS A RECORD LEVEL OF STOCKPILED COAL DAMPENING NEED FOR NEW DOMESTIC MINES - IEEFA
Proposed coal mining expansions at odds with excess supply
India has stockpiled a record 132 million tonnes of coal – enough t ...
Wednesday, 14 April 21
BANGLADESH NEEDS A RENEWABLES FOCUS, NOT A SWITCH FROM 'COAL TO GAS' - IEEFA
Renewables are cheaper and more sustainable than gas imports, and can provide better energy security in developing nations
The emerg ...
|
|
|
Showing 596 to 600 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- PTC India Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- The University of Queensland
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Planning Commission, India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
|
| |
| |
|
