We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 30 April 21
HIGH-SULPHUR FUEL OIL SALES REBOUND AFTER PRE-IMO 2020 - BIMCO
HSFO sales are up 47.2% from Q1 2020, reaching 3.1m tonnes. This is however still less than a third of high-sulphur fuel sales in Q1 2019, before t ...
Wednesday, 28 April 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Despite the current challenges as a result of the global pandemic, 2021 is turning out to be a landmark year for the iron ore market with spot pric ...
Monday, 26 April 21
CHINA TO FURTHER CUT COAL USE IN 2021 - XINHUA
China aims to reduce the share of coal in its energy mix to less than 56% this year, according to a guideline released by the National Energy Admin ...
Wednesday, 21 April 21
COAL FINANCING COSTS HAVE SURGED IN PAST 10 YEARS - UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD - THE GUARDIAN
Coal financing costs have surged over the last decade as investors demand returns four times as high as the payoff required from renewable energy p ...
Tuesday, 20 April 21
US DOLLAR LIBOR TRANSITION IN ASSET FINANCE - WHERE ARE WE NOW? - WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS
Since our last article, there has been a raft of regulatory and market body announcements relating to the transition away from LIBOR and the follow ...
|
|
|
Showing 591 to 595 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
