We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 17 February 10
JORONG COULD COST BANPU 5%
Banpu Plc, Asean's biggest coal miner, forecasts a 5% drop in revenue if its suspended coal mine in Indonesia is closed for one year, says presiden ...
Wednesday, 17 February 10
RUSSIA KRU JAN COAL EXPORTS DOWN 4 PCT
Kuzbassrazrezugol, Russia's second largest steam coal producer, exported 1.859 million tonnes of coal last month, down 80,000 tonnes or 4 percent f ...
Wednesday, 17 February 10
VEDANTA SET FOR PORTS ENTRY WITH VIZAG TENDER
Vedanta, along with Leighton Contractors India, quoted a revenue share of 38.1% to win the 30-year contract
Mining and metals conglomerate Vedant ...
Tuesday, 16 February 10
TRENDS DRY BULK MARKET ... TRENDS - BRS
The start of the Chinese New Year had an immediate impact on rates and for once all the dry bulk segments lost similar ground.
The BDI fell 5%, a ...
Tuesday, 16 February 10
LAW POSES THREAT TO INDONESIA'S COAL INDUSTRY
A zoning law could cost coal miners billions of dollars this year alone, hurt investment in the industry and disrupt the supply of the fuel to the c ...
|
|
|
Showing 5986 to 5990 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- The University of Queensland
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
