We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 08 April 10
NAPOCOR GETS ONE OFFER AT COAL TENDER - ABS CBN
ABS- CBN News reported that, Philippine power producer National Power Corp. (Napocor) is likely to buy 50,000 tons of steam coal from PT Berau Coal ...
Wednesday, 07 April 10
DRY BULK MARKET LOOKING FOR DIRECTION
The dry bulk market has kept a low profile during the past week, as evidenced by the small changes of a usually rather turbulent Baltic Dry Index (B ...
Tuesday, 06 April 10
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS RISE 24%, SHIP QUEUE SHORTENS - BLOOMBERG
Bloomberg reported that, Coal shipments from Australia’s Newcastle port, the world’s biggest export harbor for the fuel used in power st ...
Tuesday, 06 April 10
UAE STEEL TRADERS FEAR LOSSES ON GLOBAL HIKE
A sudden spurt in the price of iron ore in the international market has caught local steel traders and manufacturers and a host of other steel-depen ...
Tuesday, 06 April 10
ASIAN INVESTORS EYE NIGERIA MARITIME INDUSTRY
Investors from the Asian region are considering investing in the Nigerian maritime sector, which has huge opportunities and potential. One of such p ...
|
|
|
Showing 5896 to 5900 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- White Energy Company Limited
|
| |
| |
|
