We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 13 April 10
CHINA COAL SEEING 'STRONG DEMAND,' PUDA COAL CFO SAYS - BUSINESS WEEK
Business Week reported that, China coal prices will increase this year as the nation’s industry expands and a drought in the southwest region ...
Tuesday, 13 April 10
PEABODY, COAL INDIA CONFIRM 'EARLY STAGE' TALKS - MINING WEEKLY
Mining Weekly reported that, US coal-miner Peabody Energy is holding discussions with Coal India, the company said on Monday, after an Australian ne ...
Tuesday, 13 April 10
ANGLO PREDICTS HIGH COAL PRICES, STEADY SUPPLY
Busrep / Reuters reported that, Coal prices were expected to remain strong this year, while exports would match last year's despite rail cons ...
Tuesday, 13 April 10
THE PANAMAX MARKET CONTINUED TO STRENGTHEN - BRS DRY BULK
Panamax rates continue to beat the market, and the Panamax 4TC is now trading at a 25% premium to the Cape 4TC — the biggest margin since the ...
Monday, 12 April 10
INDIA'S NALCO TO INVEST BIG IN INDONESIA'S ALUMINIUM PROJECT - BERNAMA
Bernama reported that, India's state- owned National Aluminium Company Ltd (Nalco) is to pump in massive investment to set up a aluminium smelter a ...
|
|
|
Showing 5886 to 5890 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Planning Commission, India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- White Energy Company Limited
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
|
| |
| |
|