We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 16 April 10
RBCT COAL DISPUTE RESOLVED - MININGMX
Miningmx reported that, the long-simmering spat over the coal allocation for producers who will use the expanded facilities at Richards Bay Coal Ter ...
Friday, 16 April 10
COAL INDIA SELECTS MERCHANT BANKERS TO ACQUIRE OVERSEAS ASSETS -THE HINDU
An investment of about $1.8 billion is expected to be made in these deals
The Hindu reported that, Bank of America-Merill Lynch, Royal Bank of Sc ...
Thursday, 15 April 10
MAJOR THERMAL COAL CONTRACT AT 40% HIGHER PRICE THAN LAST YEAR - BUSINESS STANDARD
Business-Standard reported that, India is expected to import nearly 60 million tonnes of thermal coal this year.
After coking coal and iron ...
Thursday, 15 April 10
RICHARDS BAY ROUNDS BACK TO INDIA SUPRAS WERE FIXED AT MID 20'S
Handy
The BSI remains in a positive momentum and the Atlantic remains unchanged from last week. Fronthaul grain is active which is keeping ballast ...
Thursday, 15 April 10
DRY BULK MARKET SLOWLY GAINING GROUND
The troubled and underperforming capesize sector of the dry bulk market has been experiencing an improved sentiment since Tuesday, a trend verified ...
|
|
|
Showing 5881 to 5885 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The University of Queensland
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Planning Commission, India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Australian Coal Association
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
|
| |
| |
|
