We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 27 July 10
DRY BULK SPOT CARGO DEMAND SHARPLY UP, TRIGGERING RISE IN RATES
Hot on the heels of the dry bulk market’s first weekly gain in almost two months, Monday began on a similar note, with the Baltic Dry Index (B ...
Tuesday, 27 July 10
KANGAROO RESOURCES INKS 297MT COAL RESOURCE FOR TANUR JAYA PROJECT
Kangaroo Resources has reported JORC Code compliant open cut Coal Resources totalling 297 million tonnes for the Tanur Jaya Coal Project in East Kal ...
Monday, 26 July 10
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE FOR JULY 2010 IS US$ 96.65 PER TON FOB VESSEL
COALspot.com: The Directorate General of Mineral, Coal and Geothermal of Indonesia has been publishing a monthly coal price reference (HBA) since Fe ...
Monday, 26 July 10
BHATIA INTERNATIONAL, MIGHT GRAB THE MAJORITY OF COAL SUPPLY ORDER FROM MAHAGENCO
COALspot.com: Maharashtra State Power Generation Co., a provider of electricity to India’s commercial hub Mumbai, has received price bids from ...
Monday, 26 July 10
CEMENT MAKERS EXPLORE NEW FUELS TO REPLACE COAL - ECONOMIC TIMES
Economic Times reported that, As the cement industry reels under high raw material costs and reduced coal linkages, companies are exploring alternat ...
|
|
|
Showing 5696 to 5700 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- The University of Queensland
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
