We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 24 July 10
INDONESIAS BUKIT ASAM H1 2010, SALES RAISED 10% TO 6.44 MILLION TONS
COALspot.com: PT Tambang Batubara Bukit Asam (PTBA), Indonesian state owned mining company’s H1 2010, sales raised 10% to 6.44 million tons. T ...
Saturday, 24 July 10
INDONESIAN COAL MINERS ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 64.96 MLN TONS OF COAL TO DOMESTIC MARKET IN 2010
COALspot.com : Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources of Indonesia has issued a ministerial degree related to Domestic market obligation (DMO) for ...
Saturday, 24 July 10
THE BDI SEEMS TO BE RECOVERING AND WAS UP BY ABOUT 6 PCT - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com: "The BDI seems to be recovering and was up by about 6 pct this week after losing for almost last 7 weeks", said Capt. Reddy, ...
Saturday, 24 July 10
ANALYSIS - GROWTH IN VESSEL SUPPLY PRESSURES OCEAN FREIGHT RATES
It's common to use global shipping rate trends as a proxy of global economic health. If demand for goods and raw materials are strong, so should it ...
Friday, 23 July 10
KOWEPO TO IMPORT ADDITIONAL 1.2 MILLION TONS OF INDONESIAN COAL WITHIN 5 MONTHS
Korea Western Power Company Limited has finalized around 1.2 million tonnes of Indonesian origin of coal last week. According to K ...
|
|
|
Showing 5701 to 5705 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Planning Commission, India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
|
| |
| |
|