We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 02 August 10
LINC, ADANI COMPLETE THEIR COAL CONNECTION
"THE much-speculated deal between underground coal gasification company Linc Energy and India's Adani Enterprises is set to be signed tomorrow ...
Saturday, 31 July 10
TABONEO ANCHORAGE TO LOAD 1.5 MLN TON OR MORE COAL IN H1 AUGUST
COALspot.com: Eighty five ocean going vessels and barges have been nominated by coal buyers to their respective suppliers in Indonesia to load about ...
Saturday, 31 July 10
SEEMS THE FREIGHT MARKET WOULD BE FAIRLY STABLE FOR H2 2010 - VISTAAR
COALspot.com: The BDI continued moving up since 16th July and rise by 14 pct almost touching 2000 points.
The BDI was up by 7.72 pct last week wh ...
Friday, 30 July 10
DRY BULK MARKET BACK ON THE ROAD TO RECOVERY
Freight rates for dry bulk carriers have continued to edge higher this week, with the industry’s main benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) ga ...
Thursday, 29 July 10
GOVT TOO OPTIMISTIC ON IRON, COAL PRICE
Federal government forecasts of continued strength in iron ore and coal prices, which underpin revenue expectations for the proposed new mining tax, ...
|
|
|
Showing 5686 to 5690 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Planning Commission, India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- The University of Queensland
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
