We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 06 August 10
KRISHNAPATNAM PORT WINS NON MAJOR PORT AWARD 2ND TIME IN A ROW
COAlspot.com ( Press Release) Krishnapatnam Port, the world-class port on the Indian horizon, took the top honors for the second time in a row, in t ...
Friday, 06 August 10
POLANDS KOPEX GROUP DEVELOPS COAL MINE IN INDONESIA
Polishmarket reported that, Polish mining concern Kopex Group, , is to build the first in Indonesia mechanised underground coal mine. The group is c ...
Thursday, 05 August 10
MORATORIUM MAY HURT NEW PROJECTS: MINING GROUP
The government’s proposed two-year moratorium on issuing new concessions to convert forests and peatlands to other uses may hinder new mining ...
Thursday, 05 August 10
IRON ORE EXPORT BAN COMPOUNDS PROBLEMS OF INDUSTRY - BUSINESS STANDARD
Forex loss of Rs 300 crore (US$ 65.63 million) ; truckers, ports, Railways bear the brunt
The Karnataka government’s move to ban the export ...
Thursday, 05 August 10
DRY BULK LOOKING TO CHINA FOR A NEW RALLY, BUT INDIA COULD BE THIS YEAR'S SURPRISE
The dry bulk market’s rebound has hit a “wall” this week, with the industry’s benchmark, the BDI (Baltic Dry Index) ending i ...
|
|
|
Showing 5676 to 5680 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Planning Commission, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
|
| |
| |
|
