We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 11 August 10
BANPU SECURES TAKEOVER LOAN - BANGKOK POST
Bangkok Post reported that, Banpu Plc, Asean's largest coal miner, has secured loans worth US$2 billion from Thai and foreign banks to proceed with ...
Tuesday, 10 August 10
KOREA'S EWP TO BUY 4 MILLION TON OF 3700 AND 4600 NAR COAL AT FIXED PRICE
COALspot.com: Korean utility East-West Power out with the tender to buy 0.670 million tons with a minimum calorific value of 4600 NAR and 0.350 mill ...
Tuesday, 10 August 10
COAL CONSTRAINS CORE SECTOR GROWTH IN JUNE 2010
Growth in the six key infrastructure sectors decelerated for the third month in June. This is primarily due to last year’s high base effect. D ...
Sunday, 08 August 10
SOUTH AFRICA INCREASES COAL EXPORTS TO INDIA BY 74% IN JULY, TRADER SAYS
South Africa’s Richards Bay, the continent’s largest coal terminal, increased sales to India by 74 percent in July from June, according ...
Saturday, 07 August 10
INDIAN COAL IMPORTS WILL PLAY AN IMPORTANT PART IN KEEPING THE FREIGHT MARKET FIRM IN FUTURE - VISTAAR
COALspot.com: The freight market was volatile with market ending firmed and the BDI crossing 2000 points up by 3 pct, however the BCI was up by 14 p ...
|
|
|
Showing 5671 to 5675 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Australian Coal Association
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
