We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 14 October 10
COAL PRICES AT QINHUANGDAO PORT UP - CAPITALVUE
Capitalvue reported that, prices of steam coal yielding 5,500 kilocalories per kilogram (kcal/kg) in Qinhuangdao Port have risen five yuan to 715-72 ...
Thursday, 14 October 10
DRY BULK MARKET MAINTAINS POSITIVE TREND ON FIRMER CHINESE IRON ORE DEMAND
The dry bulk market has kept its upward trend set since last week, with the industry’s main benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) rising to 2, ...
Tuesday, 12 October 10
DRY BULK MARKET LOOKING FOR DIRECTION AFTER WEEK OF CAPESIZE GROWTH
The dry bulk market ended Monday unchanged from Friday’s closing, today standing at 2,695 points. In summary, the capesize and the supramax se ...
Tuesday, 12 October 10
COAL SPOT TRADING MAY SOOTH PRICING CONFLICTS - GLOBAL TIMES
Global Times reported that, Tianjin-based Bohai Commodity Exchange launched steam coal for spot trading for the first time Monday. Steam coal is mai ...
Monday, 11 October 10
INDONESIAN POWER PLANTS AND OTHER INDUSTRIES TO BURN 78.97 MLN TONS OF COAL IN 2011
COALspot.com: The Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources of Indonesia has issued a ministerial degree 2360 K/30/MEM/ 2010 related to Domestic mark ...
|
|
|
Showing 5566 to 5570 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Planning Commission, India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
|
| |
| |
|