We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 21 October 10
WORLDS FIRST, SINGAPORE EXCHANGE TO CLEAR OTC INDONESIAN COAL SWAP - MONDOVISIONE
Mondovisione reported that, Singapore Exchange (SGX) will be the first exchange in the world to clear over-the-counter (OTC) Indonesian Sub-Bitumino ...
Thursday, 21 October 10
MEC WOOS INDIAN POWER FIRMS FOR 50% STAKE SALE - BUSINESS STANDARD
Business-Standard reported that, Singapore-based MEC Coal plans to rope in an Indian power company as a 50 per cent equity partner. It is believed t ...
Thursday, 21 October 10
CAPESIZE, A FANTASTIC WEEK WITH IMPROVED RATES IN BOTH BASINS - FEARNBULK
Handy Activity remains slow this week combined with a lack of fresh enquiry in the Atlantic. Indexes are all negative except Cape but it is worth no ...
Wednesday, 20 October 10
BLENDING OF IMPORTED COAL AT THERMAL PLANT UP TO 30 % MAY BE ALLOWED - PUNJAB NEWS LINE
Punjab News Line reported that, Indian government is considering allowing increase in the blending ratio of imported coal from 10 to 30 percent at t ...
Wednesday, 20 October 10
CANADIAN CHALLENGER ACQUIRES INDONESIAN COAL PROJECT
COALspot.com (Press Release): According to Challenger Deep Resources Corp's website and press release posted on the site, Challenger Deep Res ...
|
|
|
Showing 5556 to 5560 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
|
| |
| |
|
