We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 09 October 10
SAIL SEEKS LONG-TERM COKING COAL SUPPLY FROM GLOBAL COMPANIES - BUSINESS STANDARD
State-owned Steel Authority of India (SAIL) Friday invited bids from global companies for long-term supply of coking coal to feed its expanding stee ...
Friday, 08 October 10
INVESTORS STILL RELUCTANT TO ENTER DOWNSTREAM INDUSTRIES - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post reported that, mining companies are showing a low level of enthusiasm to enter the downstream industries, as required by the 2009 M ...
Friday, 08 October 10
VESSEL OWNERS ARE RELUCTANT FOR INDONESIA TO INDIA COAL TRIPS - FEARNBULK
Handy
Last week ended with a flourish of activity as the Chinese tried to fix any prompt vessels before the Golden week festivities, and since the ...
Thursday, 07 October 10
MIRACH ENERGY GAINS RIGHTS TO EAST KALIMANTAN COAL MINE - THE EDGE SINGAPORE
The Edge Singapore reported that, Mirach Energy says it has gained the rights to produce and sell coal in an open-pit coal mine in Samarinda, the ca ...
Tuesday, 05 October 10
EWP SEEKING VIETNAMS ANTHRACITE COAL
COALspot.com: South Korea’s EWP is seeking Min 200,000MT of Vietnam coal with plus or minus 30,000MT at EWP’s (Korea East West Power Co ...
|
|
|
Showing 5576 to 5580 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Planning Commission, India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- The University of Queensland
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- White Energy Company Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
|
| |
| |
|