We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 26 October 10
DRY BULK MARKET TO KEEP RISING THIS WEEK ON STRONG CHINESE IRON ORE AND THERMAL COAL DEMAND - HELLENIC SHIPPING
Overcapacitated or not, the dry bulk market keeps its positive momentum as we move forward this week, with the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) rising by 0.77 ...
Monday, 25 October 10
TWO CHINESE COMPANIES INK DEAL TO TAP AUSSIE COAL RESERVES
China Daily reportd that, two Chinese coal firms have teamed up to explore and develop coal resources in an area in Australia that has forecast rese ...
Monday, 25 October 10
DRY BULK MARKET STILL HEAVILY DEPENDENT ON CHINA, POSTS SMALL WEEKLY LOSS OF 1.27% - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
With every twitch and turn from China’s metals industry, the dry bulk market is disproportionally affected, as evidenced by the course of the ...
Sunday, 24 October 10
SUPRAMAX VESSELS BEING FIXED AROUND $ 15 K PER DAY DELIVERY N. CHINA FOR TRIP VIA INDONESIA TO INDIA - VISTAAR SHIPPING
COALspot.com: The freight market this week remained almost at same levels with not much change. However the Far East/SE Asia market was quite soft w ...
Saturday, 23 October 10
HEAVY RAINS NO DAMPENER FOR 2010 COAL OUTPUT TARGET, MINISTRY SAYS - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
The Jakarta Globe reported that, National coal production would likely meet the target set by the Energy Ministry despite unusually heavy rain this ...
|
|
|
Showing 5551 to 5555 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- White Energy Company Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
