We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 12 November 10
BANPU'S NET PROFIT HAS INCREASED 249 PERCENT IN 3Q 2010 COMPARED TO THE SAME PERIOD LAST YEAR
COALspot.com: Banpu Public Company Limited (BANPU) reports its financial performance for the third quarter 2010, posting a net profit of THB 13,293 ...
Friday, 12 November 10
DRY BULK MARKET STILL ON A FREEFALL - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market failed to show any signs of life this week, with the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) still being on the red, now stretching more than 11 ...
Thursday, 11 November 10
KOMIPO WANTS 400KT OF SUB BITUMINOUS COAL
COALspot.com : Korea Midland Power Co. Ltd. (KOMIPO) is looking for 400,000 MT of sub bituminous coal through International open bidding. The delive ...
Wednesday, 10 November 10
NTPC TO IMPORT 12 MILLION TONS OF COAL IN 2011
COALspot.com: India's State Trading Corp Ltd a public sector Govt of India co. is looking for 12 million tones (+/- 2%) of imported coal for NTPC. ...
Tuesday, 09 November 10
NOBLE GROUP APPOINTED AS THE EXCLUSIVE MARKETING AGENT FOR PT. BERAU COAL
COALspot.com: Noble Group Limited has recently been appointed as the exclusive marketing agent for PT. Berau Coal production exported to internation ...
|
|
|
Showing 5531 to 5535 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- The University of Queensland
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- White Energy Company Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|