We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 08 November 10
INDONESIAN HBA HAS INCREASED TO $ 95.51 PER TON FOR NOVEMBER LOADING
COALspot.com: The Directorate General of Mineral, Coal and Geothermal of Indonesia has been publishing a monthly coal price reference (HBA) since Fe ...
Sunday, 07 November 10
THE SUPRAMAX INDEX IN THE FAR EAST CONTINUED TO BE UNDER PRESSURE - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com: The freight market continued to remain soft and all segments were down by almost about 6 pct.
The BDI and Cape Size index was down ...
Saturday, 06 November 10
DRY BULK MARKET LACKING SUPPORT TO SUSTAIN CURRENT LEVELS, BUT PANAMAX OWNERS ARE MORE FORTUNATE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Posting its fifth straight losing session, the dry bulk market benchmark, the BDI (Baltic Dry Index) was down yesterday by another 1.26% to 2510 poi ...
Friday, 05 November 10
RI COAL EXPORT PROSPECTS STILL BRIGHT - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post reported that, Indonesia, already the world’s largest exporter of seaborne thermal coal since 2005, will continue to be a maj ...
Thursday, 04 November 10
CAPE SIZE SENTIMENT FOR THIS WEEK WAS NEGATIVE - FEARNBULK
Handy
The Atlantic markets remain flat and lackluster. High volume of tonnage availabi ...
|
|
|
Showing 5536 to 5540 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PTC India Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The University of Queensland
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
