We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 20 November 10
ITALIAN STEAM COAL MARKET HAS RECOVERED - ITALIAN COAL ASSOCIATION
Press Release - This year Italy will import 17 million tons of steam coal, up 3% from 2009, and 5.5 million tons of coking coal and PCI, up 37% over ...
Friday, 19 November 10
WE'LL THINK ABOUT COAL TOMORROW - ANALYSIS
The future of coal generation in Russia is in question. The largest energy companies have abandoned their initial plans to switch their therma ...
Friday, 19 November 10
DRY BULK MARKET ON THE ROPES WITH BDI PLUNGING TO 2,164 POINTS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
With the panamax markets suffering the most this week, but a ray of hope for the capesize market, which appears to be stabilizing after days of fall ...
Thursday, 18 November 10
WORLD COAL ASSOCIATION WELCOMES NEW CHAIRMAN & SHENHUA GROUP AS NEW MEMBER 17 NOVEMBER 2010
Press Release – The premier global coal industry association marks its 25th anniversary with a new Chairman and welcomes China’s lar ...
Thursday, 18 November 10
MUNDRA PORT AWARDED BEST PRIVATE PORT - COMMODITY ONLINE / HELLENIC SHIPPING
Adani Group owned, Mundra Port has been awarded the Annual Indian Maritime Gateway Award for the Best Private Port of the Year for the third consecu ...
|
|
|
Showing 5521 to 5525 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|