We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 26 November 10
INDIA WILL IMPORT 100 MLN TONS OF COAL BY 2012 - LAKSHMINARAYANA
COALspot.com – “India’s coal shortfall will reach 100 million mt by 2011-12”, said Lakshminarayana, Vice Preside ...
Friday, 26 November 10
CHINAS COAL INVENTORY STAYS HIGH FOR 22 MONTHS AT 220 MLN T, ASSOCIATION
Xinhua News Agency reported that, China’s coal inventory has stayed high and unchanged for 22 months to be around 220 million tonnes, reflecti ...
Friday, 26 November 10
DR WOLFGANG CIESLIK TO HEAD GERMAN COAL IMPORTERS ASSOCIATION
COALspot.com – (Press Release): The Management Board of the German Coal Importers Association (Verein der Kohlenimporteure e.V.) has elected D ...
Thursday, 25 November 10
ANALYSIS: COAL SECTOR: VALUE EMERGENCE - THE JAKARTA POST
Coal demand will remain firm due to a build-up of coal-fired power plants in India, China and Indonesia. As a result, we have upgraded our coal pric ...
Thursday, 25 November 10
INDONESIAN ROUNDS ARE ACHIEVING IN THE LOW 10S, OWNERS ARE NOT KEEN FOR TRIPS TO INDIA - FEARNBULK
HANDY
Uneventful week - Supra/Panamax stems ex USG to China/Korea/Japan are the main focus + grains ex. Argentina. The Atlantic market activity re ...
|
|
|
Showing 5511 to 5515 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- White Energy Company Limited
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Planning Commission, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|