We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 15 February 11
INDONESIAN COAL FOR HARYANA THERMAL PLANTS - PUNJAB NEWS LINE
To tide over the recurring coal shortage at thermal plants Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited (HPGCL) has gone for Malaysian coal for its ...
Tuesday, 15 February 11
TONNAGE OVERSUPPLY TO CHOKE FREIGHT RATES IN THE COMING MONTHS SAYS BIMCO - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
In a new report assessing the dry bulk market, BIMCO’s analysis suggests that freight rates for Capesize vessels are likely to remain depresse ...
Sunday, 13 February 11
COAL MARKETS 2011 TO HIGHLIGHT INDONESIAN COAL AND NEW SOURCES OF COAL SUPPLY
“Over 300 senior decision-makers from coal mining, power and trading companies expected to congregate in Singapore”
Press Release - K ...
Sunday, 13 February 11
YEAR OF RABBIT PUSHING FREIGHT MARKET UP
COALspot.com – “The market finally moved up with firmness in all sectors with some positive signs of markets recovering”, said Cap ...
Friday, 11 February 11
DRY BULK MARKET HEATING UP ON FRESH CARGO DEMAND - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market is on a high this week, with owners of smaller vessels turning their attention towards the spot market, in order to take advanta ...
|
|
|
Showing 5376 to 5380 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
|
| |
| |
|
