We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 24 February 11
SUPRAS ARE FIXED AT CLOSE TO 10K FOR TRIPS VIA INDONESIA TO INDIA WITH COAL - FEARNBULK
Handy
After a short lived surge in rates the Atlantic market has flattened out due to too many spot vessels. The USGulf has cooled down somewhat f ...
Wednesday, 23 February 11
LIMITED AVAILABILITY OF COAL COULD TRIP MEGA POWER PLANT - THE ECONOMIC TIMES
The Economic Times, an Indian leading news paper reported that, an acute shortage of domestic coal is threatening to destabilize new power generatio ...
Wednesday, 23 February 11
DRY BULK MARKET BACK ON RETREAT MODE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The two week rise of dry bulk freight rates seems to have come to a halt this week, with the industry’s benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) lo ...
Wednesday, 23 February 11
INDONESIA NEEDS TO REVISE EXPORT BAN ON 5600 GAD COAL EXPORT - INDUSTRY
COALspot.com - The Indonesian government may be forced to revise its 2014 timeline for the proposed ban on all low quality coal exports, Patrick Han ...
Tuesday, 22 February 11
SUPRAMAX MARKET IS IMPROVING IN THE PACIFIC
BRS - A 10% rise in the BDI this week, mostly on the back of Panamax rates and improvements in the Supramax market in the Pacific. For the Capes, ra ...
|
|
|
Showing 5366 to 5370 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Australian Coal Association
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Planning Commission, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The University of Queensland
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- White Energy Company Limited
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
|
| |
| |
|
