We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 10 February 11
SUPRA RATES IMPROVED A LITTLE OVER US$ 6K BSS N. CHINA DELIVERY FOR INDO-INDIA AND THAILAND ROUNDS - FEARNBULK
Handy
Atl is still weak with little fresh enquiry and an accumulation of spot tonnage.Owners are reluctant to send tonnage thru Suez due to uncert ...
Thursday, 10 February 11
BUKIT ASAM EXPECTS ABOVE RP 3 TRIO PROFIT
The state-owned coal miner PT Tambang Bukit Asam Tbk (PTBA) expects to reach 2011's net profit above Rp 3 trillion (US$ 336,322,568) from above Rp2 ...
Wednesday, 09 February 11
INDONESIA ALLOWED 60 COAL TRADING COMPANIES TO EXPORT COAL
COALspot.com - A temporary ban imposed on coal traders in January has lifted this week. As of today 60coal trading companies were allowed to resume ...
Tuesday, 08 February 11
INDIA'S SIMHAPURU TARGETS S.AFRICAN COAL - ECONOMIC TIMES
Economic Times reported that, India's Simhapuri Energy , a unit of the Madhucon Group , wants to buy new or existing collieries in South Africa fro ...
Tuesday, 08 February 11
PUSTAKA JAYA PALU POWER LOOKING FOR 5800 GAD COAL
COALspot.com - According to market information, PT Pustaka Jaya Palu Power, a power plant operator of the Mpanau plant, Palu, Sulawesi has invited c ...
|
|
|
Showing 5381 to 5385 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PTC India Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
|
| |
| |
|
