We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 04 March 11
IRON ORE FROM INDIA HAS BEEN QUIET
Handy
Activity has been gradually rising in the Atlantic but it is mostly confined to the USG market. Short period basis redelivery Atlantic has b ...
Thursday, 03 March 11
TNPL INDIA LOOKING FOR 160,000 MT OF NON-COKING COAL
COALspot.com - Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Ltd. is seeking to import 160,000 plus minus 5 percent metric tons of non-coking coal with Gross Calo ...
Wednesday, 02 March 11
MIXED FORTUNES FOR DRY BULK OWNERS THIS WEEK - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Although the dry bulk market has been on the positive side this week, things still look quite uncertain in the near term, with most owners puzzled a ...
Wednesday, 02 March 11
INDIA, 2ND LARGEST IMPORTER OF INDONESIAN COAL IN 2010
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the world largest coal exporter, shipped 24.68 million tons of coal in January 2011, which was 1.19 percent higher Y-o- ...
Tuesday, 01 March 11
GANGAVARAM PORT, AN INDIAN MODERN PORT CREATES RECORD
COALspot.com - Gangavaram Port, the deepest and the most modern port in India creates yet another record by discharging 65349 MT Coking Coal in 24 h ...
|
|
|
Showing 5356 to 5360 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Australian Coal Association
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- White Energy Company Limited
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- PTC India Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- The University of Queensland
|
| |
| |
|