We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 13 March 11
COAL NO LONGER A CHEAP ENERGY SOURCE - THE SUNDAY LEADER
The Sunday Leader reported that, the addition of power generated through coal power to the country’s national grid was initially expected to r ...
Sunday, 13 March 11
THE FREIGHT MARKET SEEMS WILL BE FIRM FOR MARCH AND APRIL - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The freight market continued to rise with the BDI crossing 1500 points and the cape size index up by 32 pct and all other segments al ...
Friday, 11 March 11
THE HANDY MARKET IS QUITE VOLATILE
Handy
Lacklustre week as the USG is the only bright light with high volumes of petcoke/coal into the Med (paying mid 20´s bss aps USG). Litt ...
Thursday, 10 March 11
DRY BULK MARKET SHOWING SIGNS OF STRONGER RECOVERY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market jumped by 3.37% yesterday, with the industry’s benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI), moving up to 1,472 points, levels no ...
Wednesday, 09 March 11
INDONESIA HAS SET THE MARCH 2011 INDONESIAN COAL REFERENCE PRICE FOR THERMAL COAL AT US$ 122.43 PER TON
COALspot.com - Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources has set the March 2011 Indonesian Coal Reference Price for thermal c ...
|
|
|
Showing 5346 to 5350 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- MS Steel International - UAE
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Planning Commission, India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|