We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 26 April 11
NTPC CALLS TENDER FOR 4 MLN TON OF NON-COKING COAL
COALspot.com - NTPC Limited, incorporated in 1975 as a public sector company wholly owned by Government of India, is the largest thermal power gener ...
Monday, 25 April 11
THE FUTURES FOR THREE YEARS WAS AT AROUND PANAMAX/US$ 14,000 PER DAY & SUPRAMAX/US$ 14,000 PER DAY - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The freight market continued to soften further with all segments down except for the handy size which was marginally up by 10 points. ...
Saturday, 23 April 11
GUPTA COAL TO BAG ONE MILLION TONS OF COAL SUPPLY ORDER FROM KPCL AT AROUND US$ 127.53 PMT
COALspot.com - Karnataka Power Corporation (KPCL), a state utility of Karnataka, India has secured its one million tons of thermal coal with c ...
Saturday, 23 April 11
STRAITS ASIA SETS 11.5 MIO TONS OUTPUT - INSIDER STORIES
Insider Stories reported that, Singapore-listed Straits Asia Resources Limited plans to jack up its coal output target of 8.5% to 11.5 million tons ...
Friday, 22 April 11
DRY BULK MARKET KEEPS FALLING, NOW AT TWO-MONTH LOWS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market seems unable at the moment to recover from the weight of newbuilding deliveries, resulting in too many ships competing for fewer ...
|
|
|
Showing 5291 to 5295 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Planning Commission, India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
