We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 30 April 11
THE PANAMAX WAS THE BIGGEST GAINER
COALspot.com - The freight market appeared to recover slightly after the Easter holidays. However they market may not move up much and likely to mai ...
Friday, 29 April 11
KOMIPO ISSUES TENDER FOR 710,000 MT OF LCV & HCV COAL
COALspot.com - Korea Midland Power Co. Ltd (KOMIPO) has issued a spot supply tender for supply of total 710,000 MT of thermal coal for delivery betw ...
Friday, 29 April 11
HARUM EYES IDR 2.58 TRILLION COAL TAKEOVER
PT Harum Energy Tbk (HRUM), that is controlled by Indonesian tycoon Kiki Barki, is poised to spend Rp 2.58 trillion (approximately US$ 301.296 mln) ...
Friday, 29 April 11
CHINA'S IMPORTS 27 PERCENT LESS COAL IN Q1 2011 - ICAP SHIPPING
ICAP Shipping reported that, China's coal imports in the first quarter were some 27% down on a year ago at 32.3 Mt (2010: 44.4 Mt). Part of the rea ...
Thursday, 28 April 11
BALTIC DRY INDEX NUDGES UP AFTER DAYS OF LOSSES - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
After consecutive falls, the dry bulk freight market, as followed through the Baltic Dry Index, finally caught a breather yesterday, with the BDI ma ...
|
|
|
Showing 5281 to 5285 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Planning Commission, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- The University of Queensland
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
|
| |
| |
|
