We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 22 August 11
MACRO ECONOMICS - PETER SAND BIMCO / HELLENIC SHIPPING
The US is jeopardising the global recovery as job creation remains top challenge across the board.
Global economy: While growth in most emerging ...
Sunday, 21 August 11
SUPRAMAX AVAILABILITY WAS TIGHT DUE TO UPCOMING RAMADAN HOLIDAYS
COALspot.com - The financial markets have been in turmoil with all major stock exchanges down and uncertainty prevails. However the shipping market ...
Sunday, 21 August 11
TUAH TURANGGA ACQUIRES DUTA NURCAHYA
Coal miner PT Tuah Turangga Agung, a wholly owned subsidiary of PT United Tractors Tbk (UNTR) via PT Pamapersada Nusantara), has agreed to acquire 6 ...
Friday, 19 August 11
INDIAS CICTL HAS ACHIEVED ONE MILLION TONS OF DISCHARGE
COALspot.com - Chettinad International Coal Terminal (CICTL) in Ennore port, a state of the art mechanized coal terminal, which was inaugurated on 28t ...
Friday, 19 August 11
AUSTRALIAS' ATH TO ACQUIRE 60% OF APUAH COAL MINE IN INDONESIA
COALspot.com - Australian listed company, Atech Holdings Limited (ATH) has entered into a conditional binding term sheet to acquire 60 percent stake ...
|
|
|
Showing 5126 to 5130 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Planning Commission, India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
|
| |
| |
|