We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 25 August 11
OPG EXPECTS COAL PRICES TO REMAIN FIRM IN THE SHORT TERM
COALspot.com - Revenue of OPG, the developer and operator of Group Captive power plants in India up 188% to £33.15m and Income from continuing ...
Thursday, 25 August 11
PAITON POWER LOOKING FOR 3.96 MILLION TONS OF COAL
COALspot.com - PT Pembangkit Jawa Bali (PJB) is looking for 3.96 million tons coal with calorific value 4,800 kcal/kg on as received basis. Accordin ...
Tuesday, 23 August 11
ICMA CALLS GOVERNMENT TO REVIEW EXPORT BAN REGULATION
COALspot.com - Chairman of the Indonesian Coal Mining Association (ICMA) Bob Kamandanu asks the government to review the regulation that being draft ...
Tuesday, 23 August 11
ADARO ENERGY ACQUIRES 75% STAKE OF PT MUSTIKA INDAH PERMAI FOR US$ 222.5 MILLION
COALspot.com - PT Alam Tri Abadi, a wholly owned subsidiary of PT Adaro Energy Tbk, signed a share purchase agreement to acquire a 75% stake of PT M ...
Tuesday, 23 August 11
COAL DEMAND IS REMAINED STRONG IN SPITE OF CURRENT GLOBAL ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY - BUMI
COALspot.com - Indonesia's largest coal producer, PT Bumi Resources, Tbk (BUMI)'s sales revenue has increased to US$1.79 billion (compared with US ...
|
|
|
Showing 5116 to 5120 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- The University of Queensland
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PTC India Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
|
| |
| |
|
