We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 17 August 11
BUMI'S H1 UNDERLYING OPERATING PROFIT $62 MILLION
COALspot.com - Bumi PLC , posted underlying first-half operating profit of $62 million and production at PT Bumi Resources and PT Berau increased to ...
Wednesday, 17 August 11
SHIP OWNERS COULD FACE PAIN ON THE BACK OF GLOOMY ECONOMYS PREDICTIONS - HELLENIC SHIPPING
The latest market turmoil, coupled with the renewed risk of a global recession could very well signal more troubled times for ship owners of all shi ...
Tuesday, 16 August 11
CHALLENGER ENTERED INTO CSPA WITH PELANGI KERTANEGARA TO ACQUIRE 100% STAKE
COALspot.com - Challenger Deep Resources Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiary, P.T. Bestindo Energy, has exercised its option to purchase an a ...
Monday, 15 August 11
ADARO ENERGYS NET INCOME MORE THAN DOUBLES IN FIRST HALF 2011
COALspot.com - Indonesian’s second largest coal producer, Adaro Energy, booked net profit US$ 268 million in the first half 2011, rose two-fol ...
Monday, 15 August 11
INDIAS MALABAR CEMENTS SEEK TO IMPORT 40,000 TONS OF COAL
COALspot.com - Malabar Cements Ltd., India's Keralaa government owned cement factory is seeking to import 40K metric tons of non-coking coal throug ...
|
|
|
Showing 5136 to 5140 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
