We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 09 October 11
FREIGHT MARKET ENDED WITH A POSITIVE DIRECTION - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The market ended with a positive note with all the segments up except for handy size. The biggest gainer was Panamax index up by 11 p ...
Saturday, 08 October 11
INDONESIAN MINER PLANS $167M IPO TO FUEL SUMATRA COAL BOOM - JG
The Jakarta Globe reported that, coal miner Atlas Resources aims to raise as much as Rp 1.5 trillion ($167 million) in an initial public offering to ...
Friday, 07 October 11
MINING REGULATIONS , OBSTACLES AND GROWTH : INDIA VS INDONESIA - SUNIL K KUMBHAT
COALspot.com - The Govt of India has passed long pending Mines & Minerals (Regulation and Development) Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace ...
Friday, 07 October 11
$100M FOR EXPANSION INTO KALIMANTAN MINING: AKR
The Jakarta Globe, one of the leading English news paper in Indonesia reported that, AKR Corporindo, a fuel and chemical distributor, has set aside ...
Thursday, 06 October 11
REALM SECURES 51% OF KATINGAN RIA COAL PROJECT IN CENTRAL KALIMANTAN
•Realm secures 51% of PT Katingan Ria Thermal Coal Project in Central Kalimantan
•Realm takes ownership of Kalres Limited
•Acquisit ...
|
|
|
Showing 5041 to 5045 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- The University of Queensland
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
|
| |
| |
|
