We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 06 October 11
SOUTH EAST ASIAS AGGRESSIVE POWER DEMAND GROWTH WILL REQUIRE INVESTMENT OF US$125 BN BY 2020 - WOOD MACKENZIE
COALspot.com - Wood Mackenzie says that South East Asia’s demand growth for new power generation is so aggressive that new power generation in ...
Thursday, 06 October 11
CHINESE DEMAND FOR COAL IMPORTS TO MODERATE IN 2012 - MISWIN MAHESH
COALspot.com - We expect Chinese demand growth for imported steam coal to moderate over the next year. Steam coal imports into China will modera ...
Wednesday, 05 October 11
MINISTRY STICKING TO RAW COMMODITY EXPORT BAN DESPITE INDUSTRY FEARS - JG
The Jakarta Globe, the one of the leading English news paper in Indonesia, reported that, the details of a controversial new regulation that would b ...
Wednesday, 05 October 11
ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC BASINS BECAME TIGHTER FOR PANAMAX LAST WEEK - BRS
A slump for both the Capes and Panamaxes sent the BDI down 1% this week, falling to 1,899 points.
The Capes saw the greatest movement, sliding - ...
Wednesday, 05 October 11
WITH CHINA ON HOLIDAY, DRY BULK MARKET REMAINS STAGNANT - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has remained to healthy levels after last month’s rally, but with China going on holiday this week, things are looking sta ...
|
|
|
Showing 5046 to 5050 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
|
| |
| |
|
