We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 26 December 14
SHIPS FACE LOWER SULPHUR FUEL REQUIREMENTS IN EMISSION CONTROL AREAS FROM 1 JANUARY 2015 - IMO
Ships trading in designated emission control areas will have to use on board fuel oil with a sulphur content of no more than 0.10% from 1 January 2 ...
Wednesday, 24 December 14
CAPE DEMAND WAS STILL EXTREMELY SOFT THIS PAST WEEK ACROSS BOTH BASINS - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The performance of the Dry Bulk market, which found itself in desperate search of support for yet another week, has left very little ...
Wednesday, 24 December 14
MARKET INSIGHT - JOHN N. COTZIAS, INTERMODAL SNP BROKER
The year is coming to an end, and we should be able to assess if this was a good year, a bad year, or even a lousy one? The answer clearly de ...
Tuesday, 23 December 14
Q1'15 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP GAINED 48 CENTS IN ONE WEEK
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month and gained week over week and day on day.
The Q1 swap has lo ...
Tuesday, 23 December 14
Q4'15 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS FALL $ 3.85 IN A MONTH
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month.
The Q1 swap has lost US$ 2.13 (-3.17%) month on month ...
|
|
|
Showing 3291 to 3295 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- White Energy Company Limited
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
